Oil Painting Express

Your cart is empty.
Upload Image | Login

Blogs

 

Movement in squares, painting by Bridget Riely

Bridget Riley, Movement in Squares, 1961

Op-art (optical-art) is stark, often minimal art that plays on optical illusion. While the idea of optical illusion art might immediately make you think of those Magic Eye books from the 90's, there is no hidden picture in these that you need to cross your eyes to see. But rather when simply viewing the art, looking at the canvases, the viewer gets the impression of movement, warping or flashing.

If you think of op-art and imagine some vague notion of a 60's mod, psychedelic aesthetic, you are on the right track. Much of this art was produced during the early 60's and did later get co-opted by the mainstream at large in various commercial contexts. Bridget Riley, an original op-artist tried to (unsuccessfully) sue a company for using her art as fabric design.

Andrei Rublev, Movie Poster, 1956

Andrei Rublev

Starring: Anatoly Solonitsyn, Ivan Lapikov

Release: 1971

 

The first film on the list (which is not ranked; these artist portraits are presented in no particular order) is Andrei Rublev (1966), about the medieval icon portrait painter and Russian Orthodox saint of the same name. Little is known about Rublev, who died in the early 15th century, so the film's director, Andrei Tarkovsky, took the slim facts and expanded from there. Initially the film's religious and political content led the Soviet government to squash its release, but over the next seven years, cut versions made their way to the Cannes Film Festival and throughout the Soviet Union. It was many years before the film was available in its totality – and quite a totality it is, at about three and a half hours long.

My husband studied Andrei Rublev back in college, and I was wary when, before we watched the movie, he announced, "I'm going to warn you – it's a little…tangential. And long." Obviously, a warning like that is unsettling and cryptic to say the least, but it's actually pretty on target.

Amoskeag Canal by Charles Sheeler

Precisonism is a truly American form of painting, a style that could really not have been made anywhere else. The inspiration for the art was the country's industrial landscape. This was close in time to the second industrial revolution. Machines had been a part of the cultural landscape, but now more than ever before, major factories were popping up left and right. The term for the style of art was coined during the 20's, the movement itself is generally said to have happened after World War 1 in the inter-war period.

These factories and buildings were the inspiration for the art, and in a pretty direct way. These artistrs's canvases were filled with images of factories, smokestacks, machines and buildings. They weren't painted in a traditional realist style, but were not majorly abstract either. The inspriation for the style was largely cubism, the images in the paintings became somewhat choppy, depicting in pieces of hard edged, geometrical forms that end up almost giving the illusion of motion, of a wobbly building.

The Last Supper, painting by Leonardo da Vinci

So my husband and I finally got around to seeing Angels and Demons this week. We'd been a little hesitant to rent it; my husband, a film student, hadn't liked The Da Vinci Code as a movie, and I wasn't crazy about the bad art history it had presented. I had enjoyed the book well enough, though, so I decided we should give it a shot. At the movie's end, we were both fairly unimpressed, but it did prompt some interesting questions.

First of all, which is a better movie about art? On the one hand, The Da Vinci Code should be applauded for showing the actual works on screen. While the real Mona Lisa wasn't shown (the Louvre unsurprisingly wouldn't allow for such bright lights to be shone directly onto the painted canvas), the other works that the characters encounter in the museum are the actual masterpieces, bringing high-quality footage of the pieces to people who might otherwise never see them.

Jackson Pollock, artist, at work

Today on our walk through art history, you will be swiftly met by action painting. This is the style of painting that so many of us often think of when we hear the words: abstract art. The image of a slap of paint unconsciously thrown across a canvas comes to mind. Think Jackson Pollock, Willem De Kooning and Franz Kline.

It was during the 40's and 50's that this style of art first came into it's own. It was the jazzy, hip New York School of painters that first started owning action painting and working exclusively in this aesthetic. The process of putting the paint on canvas could have been seen as performance art itself, and this unconscious action was really what the heart of the movement was all about. The artists smeared, dribbled, threw and splashed paint onto their canvases, Pollock famously hid things like cigarette butts in his.

Rainbow Bridge Viewed From Odaiba Tokyo Bay Carlson

Night photography with a digital camera can be a very difficult but rewarding. During the holiday season, when days get shorter, we often want to capture photographs of outdoor moments, such as Christmas caroling or our home light displays. However, these desires are often frustrated when all our digital cameras capture is blackness or unintelligible blurs. Depending on the type of camera you own, there are different ways to approach the problem.

Some simple consumer grade cameras come with a preset night mode, but the resulting pictures are oftentimes blurry with streaky color. This effect can be good if you want to pretend to take pictures of ghost or enter an art contest for high schoolers, but it’s less than thrilling for those of us who want to capture an actual moment. An easy solution is to invest in a tripod or monopod, or simply rest the camera on a surface more stable than your hand. A flat, steady surface is a necessity for quality night photography taken on a simple digital camera.

Sculpture 25, by Jen Stark

Sculpture 25, by Jen Stark

2010 is upon us! A new decade unfolding before our eyes that will surely bring it's own regrettable trends and revolutionary ideas in the art-world. In the regular-world art is slower, impressionist paintings that were at the time considered to be “not real art” are now revered the world over as true masterpieces. And it seems many people are still coming around to the modern and abstract art of the last mid-century. Art has undergone many metamorphosis in the past century, but one might not know it as the art from a hundred-plus years ago remain the undisputed masterpieces for many people.

Whether or not you thought we'd have flying cars by now, we are living in the 21st century, onto the second decade—this is the future! We've got cutting edge technology, but in a lot of ways cutting edge aesthetics have not totally caught up. With these thoughts in mind, I'd like to ring in the new year by taking a look at the recent trends in art of the past decade, and where we have really come in the past 100 years.

Santa's Surprise(1949), artwork by Norman Rockwell. ©The Norman Rockwell Licensing Company

Santa's Surprise(1949) by Norman Rockwell

With the holidays going on full-blast, we at Oil Painting Express thought, why not get into the frenzy and go with a holiday theme. And who could be a more appropriate Christmas artist than Norman Rockwell. While Rockwell is synonymous with innocence and American family life (like Christmas) recent arguments bring forth the idea that there is a darker side to the iconic illustrations (ironically, also like Christmas.)

Rockwell is perhaps best known for his Saturday Evening Post magazine covers. His illustrations are seen as idealizations of the American life. Rockwell was the first to recognize this in interviews, saying that he painted the world as he wanted to see it—not as is was. He also was looking to capture a wide audience by focusing on the working class and the cultures of middle America.

Christ Pantocrator mosaic from Daphni, Greece, ca. 1080-1100

On our recent trip to Greece, my husband and I saw them everywhere: taped to the dashboards of buses, crammed one above the other in tiny cave chapels, centered in the omnipresent roadside shrines, propped up besides cash registers in bakeries, lining the walls of gift shops, and – of course—in places of adoration in Greek Orthodox churches. Highly symbolized icons, images of Christ and the saints, seemed to be everywhere.

The painted icons generally showed several figures (sometimes a scene, but more often just one or two individuals) sitting, with a solid background of metal or gold leaf, for the viewer to reflect upon. The Virgin Mary and her son Jesus were the most common subjects, shown in several repeated poses: Christos Pantokrator (“Christ Almighty”, grasping the New Testament in his left hand and holding his right hand up in blessing) and Maria Glykophilousa (“Mary of Loving Kindness”, holding her young son and gently touching her cheek to his), just to name two. The poses that go with each name are very specific, and the title always matches the way the figures are standing and what they are holding.

Rite of Spring, painting by Ronnie Landfield

Rite of Spring, painting by Ronnie Landfield

Lyrical abstraction is, to me almost what is sounds like it would be Don't words those two words conjure images of swirling psychedelic hues and lines of rainbow color? The look of this art was flowing abstract pieces that were emotional and intuitive rather than cold and calculated. The artists behind this movement were opposed to the rigid art that came before it. The emphasis was less on creating a piece of art for the viewer and more about the experience of creating art, it was about a personal expression.

This movement was born in Europe after World War II but an American version happened in the 1960's. This movement has been speculated as a way for France to again find it's identity in art after the war. These french artists looked to Wassilly Kandinsky as a sort of grandfather to the lyrical abstraction style.

Page: 123456789

Syndicate content