Oil Painting Express

Your cart is empty.
Upload Image | Login

LaraHS's blog

 

Basquiat, Movie Poster (1996)

Basquiat

Starring: Jeffrey Wright, David Bowie, Benicio del Toro, Gary Oldman

Release: 1996

The career of the Neo-expressionist painter Jean-Michel Basquiat is the subject of the film Basquiat, released just seven years after the painter’s death of a heroin overdose. The son of a Puerto Rican mother and Haitian father, Basquiat’s art reflected his ethnic heritage and the New York street scene, incorporating graffiti into his anatomically interested images. The film follows the painter’s uncomfortable journey from homeless street artist to member of the New York art elite.

Basquiat was a part of a circle of artists who incorporated multiple media into their works, and he performed music and DJed, while also selling homemade postcards to support himself early in his career. As the art community started to recognize his unique voice and viewpoint, the film represents him as drifting further away from his friends and musical collaborators, until he is left with very few close relationships. As the film nears its conclusion, Basquiat’s only lasting relationships are with Andy Warhol (played here by David Bowie) and characters played by Benicio del Toro and Gary Oldman.

Pollock, Movie Poster, 2000

Pollock

Starring: Ed Harris, Marcia Gay Harden

Release: 2000

 

When is an artist considered a success? When the first canvas is sold? When the work can financially provide a comfortable life? When a piece gives its creator personal satisfaction? Or is there something else that defines success? These questions are central to this week"s film,
Pollock, the 2000 film that portrays Jackson Pollock"s rise to artistic fame and his relationship with his wife, painter Lee Krasner. Beginning shortly before the two painters meet (she seeks him out after learning that they each would have a painting in the same exhibition) and ending with his death, the film investigates the artists" conflicting definitions of success.

Throughout the film, Pollock experiences various landmarks that would seem to indicate artistic success. Peggy Guggenheim features his work in her gallery, invites him to paint a mural for her home, and becomes his official patron. He has individual exhibitions at the Betty Parsons Gallery. He is the subject of a Time article. Photographer Hans Namuth spends several months filming and photographing him. He becomes as much a household name as any contemporary artist can.

Goya's Ghosts, Movie Poster, 2006

Goya's Ghosts

Starring: Natalie Portman, Javier Bardem

Release: 2006

 

From Andrei Rublev, audiences do not really get a coherent and accurate biography of the life of Russia"s most famous painter of icons, but, what they do get is a fairly honest sense of the nature and quality of life Medieval Russia and how that experience is reflected in orthodox art of the period. In Lust of Life, viewers of the film can glean a fairly accurate understanding of the circumstances surrounding and the overall arc of the life of Van Gogh, as long as they don"t get to hung up on the details.Goya"s Ghosts, meanwhile, deals with a plot and story that are complete contrivance -- a made up tale and a good a sordid story. Like the previous two films discussed in this list, the film assumes the premise that the artist, in this case Spain"s Francisco Goya, captures in his unique style the zeitgeist of his era.His surroundings and environment directly influence his work.Yet, Goya"s Ghosts is decidedly more concerned with the year it was released (2005) than it is with 1797, the year in which it is set.

Lust for Life, Movie Poster, 1956

Lust for Life

Starring: Kirk Douglas, Anthony Quinn

Release: 1956

Lust for Life stars Kirk Douglas and presents the career of Vincent van Gogh, including the influence of his friendships with painters Camille Pissarro, Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, and Paul Gauguin (a part which won Anthony Quinn an Oscar). Although melodramatic at times, the film presents a surprisingly honest portrayal of the artist's life – his live-in relationship with a prostitute, his mental illness, and his suicide are all represented in a fullness that you might not expect from a movie released in 1956.

Sitting to watch this movie, I figured there wouldn't be anything further from the last movie on the list. After all, Andrei Rublev is a fairly inaccessible Soviet era Russian art film, while Lust for Life is a lavish Hollywood biopic. And on first viewing, my expectations were met. Where Andrei Rublev relished its artist's subject more than it celebrated his work and pushed the painter to the sidelines of his own namesake film, Lust for Life savors van Gogh's larger-than-life status. When young van Gogh argues with his instructors in the opening scenes, insisting that he passionately wants nothing more than to become a minister, the movie feels almost too self-aware – it knows that the audience already knows where this story is going and that young Vincent will fail in religious life.

Andrei Rublev, Movie Poster, 1956

Andrei Rublev

Starring: Anatoly Solonitsyn, Ivan Lapikov

Release: 1971

 

The first film on the list (which is not ranked; these artist portraits are presented in no particular order) is Andrei Rublev (1966), about the medieval icon portrait painter and Russian Orthodox saint of the same name. Little is known about Rublev, who died in the early 15th century, so the film's director, Andrei Tarkovsky, took the slim facts and expanded from there. Initially the film's religious and political content led the Soviet government to squash its release, but over the next seven years, cut versions made their way to the Cannes Film Festival and throughout the Soviet Union. It was many years before the film was available in its totality – and quite a totality it is, at about three and a half hours long.

My husband studied Andrei Rublev back in college, and I was wary when, before we watched the movie, he announced, "I'm going to warn you – it's a little…tangential. And long." Obviously, a warning like that is unsettling and cryptic to say the least, but it's actually pretty on target.

The Last Supper, painting by Leonardo da Vinci

So my husband and I finally got around to seeing Angels and Demons this week. We'd been a little hesitant to rent it; my husband, a film student, hadn't liked The Da Vinci Code as a movie, and I wasn't crazy about the bad art history it had presented. I had enjoyed the book well enough, though, so I decided we should give it a shot. At the movie's end, we were both fairly unimpressed, but it did prompt some interesting questions.

First of all, which is a better movie about art? On the one hand, The Da Vinci Code should be applauded for showing the actual works on screen. While the real Mona Lisa wasn't shown (the Louvre unsurprisingly wouldn't allow for such bright lights to be shone directly onto the painted canvas), the other works that the characters encounter in the museum are the actual masterpieces, bringing high-quality footage of the pieces to people who might otherwise never see them.

Rainbow Bridge Viewed From Odaiba Tokyo Bay Carlson

Night photography with a digital camera can be a very difficult but rewarding. During the holiday season, when days get shorter, we often want to capture photographs of outdoor moments, such as Christmas caroling or our home light displays. However, these desires are often frustrated when all our digital cameras capture is blackness or unintelligible blurs. Depending on the type of camera you own, there are different ways to approach the problem.

Some simple consumer grade cameras come with a preset night mode, but the resulting pictures are oftentimes blurry with streaky color. This effect can be good if you want to pretend to take pictures of ghost or enter an art contest for high schoolers, but it’s less than thrilling for those of us who want to capture an actual moment. An easy solution is to invest in a tripod or monopod, or simply rest the camera on a surface more stable than your hand. A flat, steady surface is a necessity for quality night photography taken on a simple digital camera.

Christ Pantocrator mosaic from Daphni, Greece, ca. 1080-1100

On our recent trip to Greece, my husband and I saw them everywhere: taped to the dashboards of buses, crammed one above the other in tiny cave chapels, centered in the omnipresent roadside shrines, propped up besides cash registers in bakeries, lining the walls of gift shops, and – of course—in places of adoration in Greek Orthodox churches. Highly symbolized icons, images of Christ and the saints, seemed to be everywhere.

The painted icons generally showed several figures (sometimes a scene, but more often just one or two individuals) sitting, with a solid background of metal or gold leaf, for the viewer to reflect upon. The Virgin Mary and her son Jesus were the most common subjects, shown in several repeated poses: Christos Pantokrator (“Christ Almighty”, grasping the New Testament in his left hand and holding his right hand up in blessing) and Maria Glykophilousa (“Mary of Loving Kindness”, holding her young son and gently touching her cheek to his), just to name two. The poses that go with each name are very specific, and the title always matches the way the figures are standing and what they are holding.

Child on Santa's Lap

For my work Christmas party last year, we were all invited to bring in a picture of ourselves as children doing something seasonal, for a game of match-the-employee-to-the-childhood-photo. Unsurprisingly, there were a lot of Santa pictures in the mix. What was unexpected, though, was a strange trend that I noticed – of the Santa pictures on the board, very few showed good, sweet children smiling at the camera from Santa’s lap. Instead, most people brought in a picture of a screaming kid trying to wriggle away from a weary St. Nick.

Why, when a bunch of adults went to their parents and requested a festive picture, did they all turn up with photos of themselves hollering and crying? Did none of us ever take normal pictures with Santa? I don’t think that’s the case. No, it seems that somewhere along the line, either my coworkers or -- more likely -- their parents sorted through a stack of old Santa pictures and deemed that the best ones, the ones worth keeping, were the ones where the tiny versions of their adult children look like complete and absolute brats.

Or, more accurately, I think, they picked the pictures where their kids didn’t look unrealistically perfect. They picked the pictures where their kids looked like themselves, skinned knees, runny noses, temper tantrums, and all. And my coworkers themselves, as adults looking back at pictures of themselves pushing a tired old man in the face, picked those pictures over their other options, too. They all preferred a “bad” Santa picture to a “good” one.

Washington Crossing the Delaware, painting by Emanuel Leutze

When it comes to painting, do you prefer an image that shows an episode in action or one that presents the individual in a still, concentrated pose? Do you prefer an active scene or a portrait? Regardless of which you prefer, both formats convey stories.

Every painting tells a story. Narrative was injected into Western art with the advent of the technique of perspective that emerged during the late middle ages and was perfected with the Renassaiance masters. Prior to that time, most high art was paid for by religious or noble institutions and focused not on drama and story as with presenting the viewer, usually illiterate peasants, with an ordered philosophical view of the world -- dogmatic non-fiction. However, as the mimetic quality of the artist’s technique improved, the realm of visual arts became more experimental, and artists could expand their work’s narrative potential. Michelangelo’s Last Judgment, while officially an altarpiece showing the Armageddon, could very well have been a graphic novel or comic book.

Page: 1234

Syndicate content